83% of companies use AI to screen resumes. 40-50% of job applications involve bot interaction. Welcome to the AI hiring arms race—where bots apply to bots, and humans rarely enter the equation.
83% of companies use AI to screen resumes. 40-50% of job applications involve bot interaction. Welcome to the AI hiring arms race—where bots apply to bots, and humans rarely enter the equation.
Source: What About AI? — Sean Boyce
You polish your resume. You craft the perfect cover letter. You click submit.
On the other side, an AI scans your application in 0.3 seconds, comparing keywords against a job description that was also written by AI.
Welcome to the AI hiring arms race—where bots apply to bots, and humans rarely enter the equation.
Here's what's happening right now in the job market:
The result? A broken system where neither applicants nor companies are getting what they want.
As James mentioned on the podcast, he saw this firsthand as a hiring manager:
"You would post a job for a project manager or program manager and you'd get 10,000 resumes. The sorting that happens isn't that high fidelity. The hiring manager ends up with a ton of resumes, doesn't have time to look through them, and punts that work to the recruiter who doesn't know that much about the job. It ends up truly being AI versus AI."
On the applicant side, the logic seems sound: if companies are using AI to filter, why not use AI to apply? Tools like LoopCV, LazyApply, and Sonara now let job seekers auto-apply to hundreds of positions with a single click.
But here's the problem: spray and pray doesn't work.
The data shows that mass-applying through bots isn't improving outcomes for job seekers. In fact, hiring managers are catching on:
| Statistic | Source |
|---|---|
| 33.5% of hiring managers spot AI resumes in <20 seconds | TopResume |
| 74% have seen AI-generated content in applications | Resume Genius |
| 54% care if a candidate used AI to create their resume | Insight Global |
Here's where it gets frustrating: companies are penalizing candidates for using AI while simultaneously using AI themselves.
According to the research:
So the company can use AI to write job descriptions, screen resumes, conduct initial interviews, and assess candidates—but if you use AI to write your resume, that's a red flag?
The double standard is real.
Both sides are trying to maximize efficiency of a fundamentally broken process. Here's what's happening:
The result? More applications, more filtering, less human interaction, and worse outcomes for everyone.
After working with dozens of clients who've been laid off and struggling to find work, we've discovered what actually moves the needle. Here's the advice we give:
The most effective job search strategy in the AI age is decidedly old-school: human connections.
As James said on the podcast: "The human angle right now, even in this age of AI, will take you a little bit further."
We're not saying don't use AI. We're saying use it strategically:
| ✓ DO This | ✗ DON'T Do This |
|---|---|
| Use AI to research companies | Use AI to mass-apply to thousands of jobs |
| Use AI to tailor resume for each role | Generate a generic resume used everywhere |
| Use AI to draft personalized outreach | Send messages that sound obviously automated |
| Use AI to prepare for interviews | Let AI replace human connection |
The key is using AI to enhance human connection, not replace it.
If you find a job you're genuinely interested in:
This approach has helped 80% of our laid-off clients get redeployed into jobs they actually want.
In an AI-saturated landscape, standing out means being human:
Remember when people used to print resumes on thicker paper to stand out? The principle is the same—find ways to be memorable in a sea of sameness.
If you're a hiring manager or company leader, here's what you should know:
The AI arms race is making your job harder, not easier. When everyone's resume looks the same because AI wrote them, and your AI filters can't distinguish quality, you end up with:
The solution? More human involvement in the hiring process, not less.
Companies that maintain human touchpoints in their hiring—real conversations, genuine assessments, relationship-based recruiting—are finding better candidates faster.
We don't just theorize about this—we live it. At What About AI, we work directly with people who've been laid off and are struggling in this market.
Our approach focuses on:
The result? About 80% of our clients who were recently laid off have been redeployed—into jobs in fields they want to work in.
These tactics work. The spray-and-pray approach doesn't.
The AI hiring arms race has created a situation where both sides are losing:
The way out isn't more AI—it's smarter use of AI combined with human relationships.
If you're job hunting, stop trying to out-automate the system. Start building real connections. Use AI as a tool to enhance your human efforts, not replace them.
The candidates who win in this environment aren't the ones with the best bots. They're the ones who remember that hiring is still, fundamentally, about humans choosing to work together.
We've created a comprehensive "AI Hiring Arms Race Guide" with:
If you're currently laid off or worried about your job security, we're here to help.
Free Resources:
Coaching: For personalized 1-on-1 help navigating this market, check out our coaching services at whataboutai.com/coaching.
We reply to every message. If you have questions, just reach out.
Take our free quiz to get a personalized assessment of how AI might impact your specific job and industry.
Take the Free QuizIBM announced it’s tripling entry-level hiring in 2026, targeting Gen Z workers. But they’ve rewritten every role for AI fluency, junior devs spend less time coding, and senior employees were let go. Is this a pipeline or a displacement?
McKinsey added an AI collaboration test to its final-round interviews. 85% of employers now use skills-based hiring. Resumes are losing their grip. We break down what’s changing and the strategies that are actually getting our clients hired.
ADP launched AI agents for 1.1 million clients across 140 countries that can run payroll, flag tax issues, and initiate promotions. HR is simultaneously the most automatable department and the one being asked to lead AI adoption. Here’s the paradox — and what to do about it.